“Equal Justice Under Law?” – Supreme Court’s Anticipated Imbalance: With Loss of Aging Justices Will Republican Rule Prevail?

With only three liberal justices out of nine currently serving on the Supreme Court, Democrats are facing a significant challenge. The age of these liberal justices is a growing concern for Democrats, as it could potentially tip the balance of the court in favor of conservatives. 

Republican Appointees 

As things stand, the Supreme Court is predominantly influenced by justices appointed by Republican presidents, with six of the nine seats held by GOP appointees.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, while in excellent health, are not immune to the risks associated with aging.

While many Democrats worry about President Joe Biden’s age, the focus is shifting to the age of the liberal justices.

The current minority of liberal justices faces the challenge of a conservative-leaning court.

Even if one conservative justice is absent, the conservative wing can still pass decisions with a 5-4 majority. This was evident in the overturning of Roe v. Wade, where three of the most conservative justices, appointed by President Donald Trump, played a crucial role.

Unexpected Vacancy

The prospect of an unexpected vacancy due to the retirement or death of a liberal justice during a Republican presidency or Senate control would be detrimental for Democrats.

A 6-3 court already poses challenges to liberal policies, but a 7-2 court would extend this disadvantage for generations.

Some conservative justices have indicated a willingness to revisit issues like interracial and same-sex marriage, which adds to the uncertainty.

To estimate the risk, we can use actuarial data, though it may not be perfect. Among three hypothetical liberal justices aged 69, 63, and 52, there is a 14% chance that at least one of them may pass away during the next president’s term, ending in January 2029.

A Possible Solution

While this risk of death is not exceptionally high, it prompts the question of what level of risk Democrats find acceptable in potentially losing the Supreme Court for an extended period.

To lower this risk, Democrats could encourage older justices to retire and refrain from overly idealizing aging justices.

President Biden, with a Democratic Senate, has an opportunity to nominate younger justices who can serve for an extended period.

Replacing aging justices with younger counterparts could reduce the risk significantly, down to 8% or even 5%, depending on the replacements.

Retirement – A Weighty Decision

The decision of whether to retire ultimately lies with the justices themselves.

Justices Sotomayor and Kagan seem to be in excellent physical condition. Yet, the political landscape and the need for long-term balance in the court are essential factors to consider.

In response to the Democrat’s new fear of aging Justices, many view aging government officials and the risks they are placing on the American people as a more significant issue throughout the political system.

One social media user commented, “Age is neither the democratic or republican parties’ biggest problem – it is corruption and ignorance that are decaying the parties from within thus outwardly destroying America.”

Newspaper Files “Seized but Not Silenced” – Judge “Disregards the 1st Amendment” With Order – Do You Smell a ‘Cop Cover-Up?’

“Inveterate Fraudster” Trump’s Surprising Deposition Tactic: Pleading the Fifth and Boring the Prosecutors to Death, Rambling About a Bathroom Refurb

The post “Equal Justice Under Law?” – Supreme Court’s Anticipated Imbalance: With Loss of Aging Justices Will Republican Rule Prevail? first appeared on The Net Worth Of.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff