In a recent development, Michigan’s House of Representatives approved a hate speech bill, HB 4474, which aims to criminalize words that cause someone to feel threatened, including the misuse of pronouns. Here’s the whole story.
Criminalizing Threatening Words
The bill introduces hate crime penalties for actions that make individuals feel “terrorized, frightened, or threatened,” with “sexual orientation” and “gender identity or expression” being included as protected classes.
Offenders could face severe consequences, such as up to five years in prison or a $10,000 fine for felony offenses.
The proposed legislation seeks to replace the existing Ethnic Intimidation Act and expand protection against intimidation.
However, critics argue that the bill raises concerns about First Amendment rights and lacks clarity in defining “harassment,” leaving it open to subjective interpretation.
… That Make People Feel Terrorized, Frightened, or Threatened
The bill’s language states that “intimidate” refers to willful conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, or threatened, which results in the victim experiencing those feelings.
Detractors argue that this approach allows penalties to be determined based on the alleged victim’s and the court’s subjective feelings.
They contend that what constitutes “intimidation and harassment” would be subject to the listener’s interpretation and the discretion of local prosecutors.
Opponents of the legislation assert that it has the potential to infringe upon free speech rights and undermine the principles of due process.
… Or Suppress and Financially Cripple Those With Different Views
Distinguished Professor Emeritus William Wagner, an expert in constitutional law and former federal judge, warns that the bill could be exploited to silence conservative viewpoints and violates the constitutional requirement of due process.
Wagner highlights the numerous cases across the country where laws like these have been used to suppress and financially cripple those with different views.
Meanwhile, Republican Representative Angela Rigas expresses concerns about the bill targeting conservatives who speak out against radical gender ideology.
Rigas argues that Michigan is now explicitly considering the gender identity issue as a “protected class,” leading to potential issues in the courts and the weaponization of the legal system against conservatives.
Seeking To Dictate People’s Thoughts?
She cites previous attempts to ban “conversion” therapy as an example of Democrats seeking to dictate people’s thoughts.
Rigas suggests that conservatives may have to rely on the courts to challenge the legislation due to the lack of Republican influence in Michigan’s branches of power.
In recent weeks, Michigan lawmakers approved legislation prohibiting so-called conversion therapy for minors.
The legislation awaits final approval by Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who has previously criticized the therapy as a “dangerous practice.”
“Our Governments Are Getting More and More Authoritarian Every Day – And We Get No Say in This – It’s Horrendous!”
As HB 4474 moves to the Michigan State Senate, which is also Democrat-controlled, for further consideration, the debates surrounding the bill’s potential impact on free speech, due process, and LGBTQ+ rights continue to intensify.
Several social media users shared their thoughts on the incident.
One Twitter user wrote, “Our governments are getting more and more AUTHORITARIAN every day – and we get no say in this – It’s horrendous!”
Another user commented, “This poor state is going off the rails. God awakens your people and allows them to bring light into the darkness.”
The post Michigan’s Shocking Power Play! Misuse a Pronoun, Face Jail Time and a $10K Penalty? first appeared on The Net Worth Of.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Khosro. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.
Source: Daily Mail