Newspaper Files “Seized but Not Silenced” – Judge “Disregards the 1st Amendment” With Order – Do You Smell a ‘Cop Cover-Up?’

In a recent decision, a judge has ruled that Kansas authorities must delete all electronic copies of a small newspaper’s files that were made during a police raid on its office and has people questioning the police department’s understanding of the First Amendment.

The Controversial Search

A small newspaper in central Kansas called the Marion County Record was raided by the police.

The police even searched the homes of the newspaper’s publisher and a City Council member. 

The raid had people furious at the Police department and brought attention to a debate about press rights in the United States.

The town of Marion, home to about 1,900 people, found itself at the center of this discussion.

The Judge’s Order

Representing the newspaper, Attorney Bernie Rhodes revealed that a judge had commanded the authorities to surrender any electronic records they obtained and to delete all copies they may have of these records, including any photos taken during the raids. 

Although both the local prosecutor and sheriff agreed that the evidence shouldn’t be retained, Rhodes insisted on a court order for a clear explanation. 

The exact content of the records will only be known once Rhodes receives a copy if he ever does.

Returned Equipment

Following the raids, the police had to return all the computers and cell phones they had seized. 

The prosecutor ultimately determined that there wasn’t enough evidence to justify keeping these items. 

A few days later, the newspaper discovered from court documents that an electronic copy of their files taken from its computers had been stored on a thumb drive. 

Suspiciously, this detail wasn’t initially disclosed in the police search warrant inventory.

Uncertain Next Steps

City officials and the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) are looking into the matter and have not provided much information on what will happen next. 

City Council members and the mayor have avoided discussing the raids, and the timeline of the KBI’s investigation remains uncertain.

Insurance companies for both the city and the county are taking steps to prepare for potential lawsuits, including one promised by the newspaper’s publisher. 

 To support the newspaper, the Kansas Press Association has organized a T-shirt sale featuring the defiant headline “SEIZED but not silenced” over the dates of the raids.

 Proceeds from this sale will aid the Kansas Newspaper Foundation, which supports similar publications across the state.

The Allegations and Response

The raids were conducted due to an accusation from a local restaurant owner who claimed that the newspaper illegally accessed her information and used it within a published story.

The agency responsible for maintaining these records said that the newspaper’s online search was most likely within legal bounds.

Despite a tip from an anonymous source providing personal information about the restaurant owner, the reporter’s actions were deemed legally acceptable.

The police chief, Gideon Cody, alleged that the newspaper and City Council member Ruth Herbel violated state laws about identity theft and computer crimes. 

However, legal experts believe that the raid may have violated privacy laws protecting journalists from revealing sources or sharing unpublished material. 

Tragic Outcome

Tragically, video footage captured the distressing search of the publisher’s home while his 98-year-old mother argued with police.

She then passed away a day later, and her death has brought even more people to support the local newspaper. 

While legal proceedings have not concluded, social media users have much to say on the matter, with one user commenting, “A judge that needs to be removed from the bench. A Police department that needs to be schooled on the Freedom of the Press.”

Other users seem to have more sinister views of the situation, with another stating, “A quick internet search of Police Chief Gideon Cody finds allegations of sexual misconduct the newspaper was reporting on… coincidence? No, power abuse and direct disregard for the 1st amendment rights. Remove the Fascist.”

Newspaper Files “Seized but Not Silenced” – Judge “Disregards the 1st Amendment” With Order – Do You Smell a ‘Cop Cover-Up?’

“Inveterate Fraudster” Trump’s Surprising Deposition Tactic: Pleading the Fifth and Boring the Prosecutors to Death, Rambling About a Bathroom Refurb

The post Newspaper Files “Seized but Not Silenced” – Judge “Disregards the 1st Amendment” With Order – Do You Smell a ‘Cop Cover-Up? first appeared on The Net Worth Of.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Gorodenkoff