Several House Republicans are making progress in stopping funding for special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations and prosecutions, targeting cases involving former President Donald Trump.
Separate Bills To Prevent the Use of Federal Funds for Smith’s Investigations Into Donald Trump
The new proposals have been met with skepticism and criticized as political posturing; they can potentially impact negotiations that would prevent a government shutdown and fuel divisions within the Republican Party.
House Republicans, including Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee, have introduced separate bills to prevent the use of federal funds for Smith’s investigations into Donald Trump.
Gaetz’s bill, introduced shortly after Trump received a target letter from the special counsel, seeks to limit the spending of federal funds for Smith’s office.
Meanwhile, Ogles’ proposal, introduced after Trump’s indictment, aims to deny Smith a federal salary.
The Proposals Could Disrupt Ongoing Negotiations
Though these proposals have gained only a handful of co-sponsors, Rep. Alex Mooney of West Virginia has supported Ogles’ bill.
Mooney, who is seeking Trump’s endorsement for a U.S. Senate seat, believes that withholding funding from Smith is necessary to stop the idea that3. The Department of Justice has a partisan bias.
These proposals could disrupt ongoing negotiations that hope to avoid a government shutdown and create divisions within the Republican Party.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from Georgia has suggested adding language to must-pass spending bills to defund Smith’s prosecutions.
A Misuse of Government Resources?
This move, if pursued, could lead to divisive votes within the House and complicate the passage of critical spending bills. Greene intends to prevent the collection of funds for what she considers a misuse of government resources.
On a recent podcast, Rep. Gaetz asked other senate members to push his bill as soon as possible to take a united stand against Smith’s office.
He acknowledged that President Biden and Senate Democrats would likely not support such legislation. However, he saw it as a marker to express where Republicans stand on the prosecution of Trump.
Democrats have strongly criticized these proposals, perceiving them as partisan moves to protect Donald Trump.
Navigating Controversial Amendments
Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin stated that Republicans appear more aligned with a cult following of Trump than a political party. They denounce using government funding as leverage to safeguard a former president facing indictment.
The ongoing negotiations over federal appropriations bills to determine spending have reached a delicate stage.
With a looming September 30 deadline, the House has yet to pass most of its spending bills, and navigating controversial amendments and proposals poses a significant challenge.
Besides the efforts to defund Smith’s prosecutions, these proposals include restrictions on abortion services, LGBTQ community programs, and diversity and equity initiatives in the federal workforce.
Prevent a Government Shutdown
With the potential for a complete standstill in appropriations negotiations, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy have suggested a short-term continuing resolution might be needed to prevent a government shutdown.
The push by House Republicans to defund special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions is gaining momentum despite limited support and concerns about its impact on government funding negotiations.
The post On the Brink – GOP’s Trump Defense Could Trigger Government Shutdown! first appeared on The Net Worth Of.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Frederic Legrand – COMEO. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.