Should Biden’s Dog Be Euthanized? He’s Bitten 11 People This Year!

President Biden’s German Shepherd, Commander, has been involved in 11 biting incidents this year, raising questions about who is liable and the potential legal consequences for the President.

The Law and the Big Question

With regard to Commander’s biting incidents, U.S. law holds dog owners responsible for bites, and some states even mandate euthanasia for repeat offenders.

However, the unique circumstances surrounding the dog’s connection to the President of the United States raise intriguing legal questions: Can the President be sued? Should Commander be euthanized?

Rules for Ordinary Citizens

According to legal experts, if Joe and Jill Biden were ordinary citizens, their homeowner’s insurance policy would usually handle the situation by assigning an adjuster and hiring a lawyer to defend them in a lawsuit.

However, because the Bidens are the President and First Lady, the Westfall Act, a federal law, grants them immunity from personal liability for actions that occur during their employment as federal employees.

To claim this immunity, the President must meet two criteria: Firstly, he must prove that he is a government official covered under the Westfall Act. Secondly, he must demonstrate that the lawsuit is based on conduct within the scope of his employment. 

A Presidential Responsibility 

Recent court decisions have determined that the President indeed qualifies as a federal employee under the Act.

As for the second criterion, owning a dog might be considered part of the President’s official responsibilities since presidential dogs have historically played a role in humanizing the president’s image and even engaging in official functions.

Whether the President can be sued for Commander’s biting incidents or not hinges on if owning Commander falls within the President’s official responsibilities.

If it does, the United States would be substituted as the defendant, governed by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), which permits lawsuits against the government. However, the FTCA poses significant obstacles to such lawsuits due to the government’s sovereign immunity.

Dog Biting Precedence

Precedence exists for suing the United States for bites caused by government dogs, such as an incident involving a tourist bitten by a military dog named Rosso at a Secret Service checkpoint during President Trump’s tenure.

Although the tourist sued under the FTCA, she lost her case due to the act’s restrictions. The FTCA’s impact on dog bite cases is significant. Typically, dog bite cases are easy to win, especially in jurisdictions where owners are automatically held liable.

However, cases against the United States are harder to win due to the FTCA. For instance, a parent’s lawsuit against the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for negligently training a dog that bit their child was barred by the FTCA, which deemed dog training a “discretionary function.”

11 Bites and No Consequences

In Washington D.C., where the biting incidents took place, the owner of a civilian dog is liable even if their dog has never bitten anyone before.

However, the situation appears different for Commander, whose 11th bite seems to have no legal consequences against the President or the United States. Furthermore, the D.C. Mayor has the authority to investigate and determine whether a dog is dangerous.

If deemed a threat to public safety, the Mayor has the power to euthanize the dog. In Commander’s case, Mayor Muriel Bowser could potentially play the role of judge, jury, and executioner.

It remains to be seen if an investigation will be initiated and if Commander will face the capital (or should we say “Capitol”) punishment. Should this occur, a standoff between the D.C. police and Commander’s Secret Service detail might emerge.

Public Response

In response to this strange case, many people feel the dog’s misbehavior comes as a consequence of an owner who has neglected their responsibility, regardless if he is the President of the United States or not.

One social media user claimed the President has seemed “confused” and, “The dog senses the confusion and reacts like any normal canine would. The answer is to remove this dog and all dogs from the custody of a nasty, confused, doddering old man.

Newspaper Files “Seized but Not Silenced” – Judge “Disregards the 1st Amendment” With Order – Do You Smell a ‘Cop Cover-Up?’

“Inveterate Fraudster” Trump’s Surprising Deposition Tactic: Pleading the Fifth and Boring the Prosecutors to Death, Rambling About a Bathroom Refurb

The post Should Biden’s Dog Be Euthanized? He’s Bitten 11 People This Year! first appeared on The Net Worth Of.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Ron Adar